If you choose an AI platform before you’ve written down what you do and don’t trust, you’re setting yourself up for a massive rework and taking on a lot of risk for your business. Trust is not just a slogan in AI. It is a set of decisions about data, control, attack surface, resilience, and the people behind the model. Start there, or you will spend the next two years cleaning up “smart” choices that quietly boxed you in.

Start With Trust, Not Tooling

Most teams treat AI the same way they handle regular software services. They check out the features, look at the pricing, and test it out briefly. But this approach overlooks something important. With AI, you’re not just sharing basic business records or information for one specific task. Instead, your employees are sharing details about how your organization operates, why certain data is important to your business, how your strategy uses that data, and even where your business might be vulnerable because of it.

Your employees end up sharing your entire business model.

Prompts, decision trails, runbooks, incident context, customer information, and even the way you examine margin levers all become part of the footprint. All of this is being sent to entities that have already started to compete with their customers in important business functions and who have publicly published how their customers use AI to improve their business outcomes.

The biggest AI labs have already been forced to turn over their customer data including prompts and AI model outputs in several court cases, some of those include major news organizations as plaintiffs. Are you ready for everything your employees send to OpenAI to be printed in the NY Times?

The biggest AI labs have run for years as academic low security organizations that are just now starting to take security seriously but can have almost a decade of previously ignored security problems to work through including the risk of unknown past breaches because of poor security prioritization.

Some of the AI labs have highly controversial leaders that have publicly struggled with personal and work trust issues, and some of the labs have stated missions that include censoring which business will be allowed to use their AIs in the future, and even have stated goals to disrupt the global economic system.

So bottom line, treat AI as an enterprise risk topic before you treat it as a procurement exercise.

Trust Principles That Actually Hold Up

Start with the boundary. Decide what leaves your environment, on which tiers, with what logging, and under which jurisdictions. If something crosses the boundary, assume it can be preserved, copied, compelled, or correlated. That doesn’t mean you should avoid hosted AI entirely; it means you segment data, choose zero-retention options when available, bring sensitive workloads closer to home, and keep the architecture flexible and as open as possible so you’re never stuck with a single vendor.

You also can’t hand your trust posture to the AI labs. Frontier providers are doing strong technical work, but they are also high-value targets of organized crime, state actors, and hackers while operating inside shifting legal and policy landscapes spending millions of dollars on lobbying in attempts to protect their own interests.

The key to successful and secure AI use is to set guardrails that survive subpoenas, vendor policy changes, and tomorrow’s breach report. In practice that looks like choosing models by task, isolating environments cleanly, and having a plan for when outside rules change faster than your roadmap. Consider that it is relatively easy to self-manage AI today with the right solution providers.

Open state of the art models now change the calculus. Smaller, domain-tuned models can now deliver state-of-the-art results on many reasoning tasks, and you can run them inside boundaries you control, greatly reducing security risks and long term costs. The right approach is a portfolio: use trusted hosted models for broad work, and keep private, tuned models for the high-volume or sensitive paths where latency, cost, and control matter most. That mix gives you performance without surrendering leverage and on-boarding big new risks.

Reliability is a design choice, not a promise. Models will hallucinate and people will make mistakes. Treat that as an engineering and process problem you can measure and improve. Ground answers with retrieval, verify with tools, and require approvals with full evidence when work touches production. Once hallucination handling is part of the product, it moves from a headline risk to a managed control.

Finally, plan for electrical power and scale. Real agents doing real work consume real compute, which comes from power. You are building an AI factory to create tokens and that always leads back to dollars. Even with better hardware, you win by learning to use smaller models well and reserving heavy reasoning for the moments where it truly pays and is worth the security risks. Make those decisions now so you don’t design yourself into a future that’s too expensive to run.

What We Built at Kindo To Meet the Trust Bar

Kindo is built to pass the CISO sniff test first and to make operators faster the same day they touch it. You describe the job in plain language. The AI plans the steps, selects the right tools, executes with the permissions you allow, retries when APIs misbehave, and returns a result you can verify. The output is something concrete like a pull request, a ticket enriched, a change record, or a report. You are not asked to drag boxes on a canvas or maintain a brittle process flowchart just to automate work. This is how AI-native technical operations get done. Learn more about how this works in practice in our launch blog, Introducing Chat Actions.

We designed the platform around model agility. You can run our smaller, DevSecOps-tuned model, Deep Hat, for secure, low-latency tasks where you want tight control and predictable cost. You can also choose from more than any models from any lab, closed or open source, or even run your own models when a task benefits from deeper reasoning or a specialized capability. Routing is a decision you make per step in a task, not a commitment you are forced to make across the whole task or even your stack.

The data boundaries match how enterprises actually operate. Secrets live server side and are injected at execution rather than sitting in prompts. Tools are presented through policy with clear autonomy levels, so “ask first” and “auto-approve within limits” are not slogans but settings you can enforce. Every action inherits the user’s scopes or the exact scopes you configure. From the first prompt to the final outcome you have a full evidence trail that stands up to an audit and helps your team learn from what happened.

Why Kindo Plus Deep Hat Helps You Future Proof

You control the trust boundary. Run sensitive, domain specific work on security and IT ops trained Deep Hat models when data or cost predictability matters. Escalate to a hosted model when it makes sense or into your own models. The choice is yours and it is explicit.

You manage costs as scale rises. Reasoning depth consumes exponentially more tokens. A capable small model that sits close to the work lets you securely protect the budget and still deliver the outcome. Save the heavy compute for the moments where it moves the needle.

You avoid lock in. The price performance curve changes every quarter. An architecture that treats models as interchangeable parts gives you leverage. You can adopt the next great advance securely without a ground up migration.

You prove outcomes. Chat Actions transforms plain language intent into a structured plan that executes under role-based access controls, policy checks, and server-side secret management. Each step generates evidence in the form of artifacts like pull requests, tickets, and reports.

We built Deep Hat in response to the same pattern now playing out across the industry. General models are making fast progress, but most of that progress is concentrated on offense. Language models are already winning capture the flag competitions, finding vulnerabilities at scale, and completing complex security tasks in one step.

Defenders need the same power, but under control. Deep Hat exists to meet that need. It gives you the precision, repeatability, and execution boundaries that offensive use cases ignore.

Where We Are Taking Chat Actions

We are building Chat Actions to operate like a real system for security teams, not a wrapper for isolated prompts. You hand it a runbook. It builds a plan, adapts to live conditions, and executes across SecOps, DevOps, and ITOps. 

Tasks that used to take days of manual work now run start to finish through a single interface. Background agents enrich data, triage alerts, correlate events, and stage response, all under the autonomy levels you set. Every step enforces policy and captures evidence.

Model routing is part of the execution model. Deep Hat handles the high-volume, deterministic tasks like patching, privilege checks, and rollback planning. Larger hosted or open models are called when broader reasoning is required.

This is a practical path to how technical operations will run when AI agents do real work at scale. We are always telling our customers to start with their technical ops, as it’s the best route to immediately see ROI and proactive security improvement. This lays the foundation for enterprise AI transformation the right way.

Why We’re Different From the Usual Suspects

We often get compared to legacy AI agent builders and SOAR tools because we can easily handle similar workflows. However, the core is different. Kindo is AI native with a real execution loop, not a canvas that asks humans to stitch boxes or low code if-then-else loops together. We also ship a domain tuned model for DevSecOps alongside a platform that provides and fully respects enterprise controls including on-premise capabilities.

We optimize for one terminal, one thread, and verified outcomes, not Rube Goldberg scripts that you have to babysit and constantly maintain. None of the point solution AI automation tools in our comparison set pair a purpose built model with an enterprise ready AI native platform the way we do.

Consider and document your AI trust posture before you buy anything. Decide what leaves your boundary and under which terms. Decide which AI models are allowed for which tasks. Decide how you will fail closed when a vendor changes a policy or an API goes sideways. Decide how you will prove what happened to auditors and to yourself.

Then choose tooling that lets you easily deploy and enforce those decisions while you move faster. That is why we built Kindo with Deep Hat AIs and Chat Actions while remaining agnostic to which AIs are supported. It is a path to transform your organization around the ever changing world of AI and keep your options open while you do it.

Tell Kindo what you want done, and we’ll take it from there. Start now with a demo.

‍