The Enterprise AI Control Center · Platform

One AI agent management platform. Your enterprise in control.

Build agents in Kindo, manage agents built elsewhere, and set the rules for how agents use data, models, and tools. An AI Data Gateway, an AI Model Gateway, and Role Based Access Control sit between every agent and what it reaches.

ANY AGENT · ANY MODEL

MCP DATA GATEWAY

OKTA · ENTRA · LDAP

CLOUD · VPC · ON PREM · AIR-GAPPED

Radar view of active AI agents by recency, labeling Soc2-evidence, Ledger-Reconcile-V3, Contract-redline, Patch-planner and Vuln-ops with the model each uses and its cost per run.

What is Kindo?

Kindo is an AI agent management platform: one place to build agents, manage agents built elsewhere, and set the rules for how every agent uses data, models, and tools. It sits between agents and what they reach, so IT, Security, Finance, and Compliance set policy once and see what every agent did and cost.

Build

Agents in Kindo

Agent Builder, Action Chat, a library of pre-built agents

Manage

Agents built anywhere

Point existing assistants and harnesses at Kindo; no rebuild

Control

Data, models, and tools

Who may use which model with which data; every call recorded

Three core capabilities

The three core capabilities of the Kindo platform

The platform is built on three capabilities. All three are needed to control AI well, and all three run fully on premises.

AI Data Gateway

AI Data Gateway: policy on every data read and write

MCP-based. Hand-built servers, so every connector runs on prem.

Observes and controls each data flow when an employee or agent reads or writes a source: SaaS, files, databases, logs, finance, HR, every Security and IT tool.

  • Credentials: individual login through Kindo, or a Group- or company-level API key set by an admin.

  • Policy and DLP on each request and response, per Group, source, model.

  • Library weighted toward Security and IT. New connector: about a week. SDK for your own.

Controls data reads and writes

Enforces policy, DLP

Source of truth your systems

Integrates with what you already use: GitHub, Microsoft Sentinel, Jira, ServiceNow, Splunk, and Slack connected to Kindo.

AI Model Gateway

AI Model Gateway: any model, under rules an admin sets once

Frontier, open-weight, custom. Provider keys vaulted; agents never hold them.

Rules per model and per Group: which sources a model may see, which DLP filters apply. Every token metered.

  • DLP filters: presets, user-defined lists, regex. Both directions.

  • Large documents chunked. Swap models, or one model per step, without rebuilding the agent.

  • Your existing gateway (Databricks AI Gateway, Azure AI Foundry) can sit underneath as a provider.

Controls which model, for whom, with what

Enforces DLP; budget alerts

Meters every token

Model Access & DLP settings table listing self-managed, Anthropic, Azure and Google models, with switches showing whether each model is enabled and whether DLP filters apply.

Identity and Access Control

Identity and Access Control: agents inherit their operator's permissions

Role Based Access Control (RBAC). The piece that turns seeing into controlling.

Who each employee is, which Group, what they may do. Users and Groups import from Okta, Microsoft Entra, or LDAP; the IdP stays authoritative.

  • Kindo issues and revokes its own keys. Revoke a key, block a model, deny a source: one action.

  • Harness agents: credentials per run. Third-party keys persist until revoked.

  • Secrets managed inside the connection where the tool supports it.

Controls who, and which agent acts for them

Enforces inherited permissions

Source of truth your IdP

Secrets Vault interface showing options to add secret with name and value fields, and a list of saved secrets with masked values.

Solutions by use case

Six use cases built on the platform

Start with the one that needs attention.

Why do AI agents need a control layer?

AI agents need a control layer because an agent reaches models and data with whatever credentials its builder had, and nothing in that path evaluates policy, enforces it, or records it. Kindo puts that control at a shared gateway that knows who is asking.

In the network

Proxy, CASB, firewall

Sees traffic. Not identity, not data semantics, not cost. Stays in place as a source.

Inside each builder

The harness's own controls

Its own agents only. Five builders: five policies, five logs. Built for builders, not controllers.

Shared gateway with identity

Kindo

Every call from any agent: resolve user, Group, owner; evaluate policy and DLP; meter; record once.

What does Kindo enforce for AI agent governance?

Kindo enforces four controls for AI agent governance that no gateway, builder, or network tool provides together: a policy point on every data read and write, an identity for every agent, attribution of every token, and one record across builders.

Data

Policy on every read and write

Model gateways see model calls; data goes around them. AI Data Gateway closes that.

Identity

An identity for every agent

Gateways know keys, not people. RBAC ties each agent to an operator and Group.

Cost

Every token attributed

One invoice, no owner. Metered to agent, owner, Group; budget alerts.

Record

One record across builders

Each tool logs itself. One Audit Trail; action-level with approvals in the harness.

Your systems stay systems of record; your IdP stays authoritative; SIEM, SOAR, and GRC stay in place. Mechanisms above; request path below.

How does Kindo process every agent request?

Kindo processes every model or data request the same way: the agent presents a Kindo-issued key, Kindo resolves it to a user, Group, and owner, evaluates policy and DLP, forwards the call, and records the decision and cost. Agents in Kindo's harness add execution controls on top.

Platform architecture

Platform architecture: two ways agents connect to Kindo

Conceptual, not a product screenshot.

Path 1 · connecting what you already run

How Kindo fits an existing AI gateway and stack

How each thing in a typical stack takes path 1.

Your AI gateway

Databricks AI Gateway or Azure AI Foundry as a provider inside Kindo; Kindo's controls in front.

Copilot Studio

Kindo registered as a model family in Azure AI Foundry; agents select it; traffic passes the gateway. No model API of its own, so this is the control point.

Developer harnesses

Claude Code, LangChain, and similar: a Kindo key and Kindo endpoints as model and MCP config.

Identity

Okta, Microsoft Entra, LDAP. IdP stays authoritative.

Security tooling

SIEM, EDR, CASB, firewall logs: sources for discovery, context for agents. Not replaced.

How Kindo works: users reach Action Bots and Action Chat; the Deep Hat model and virtual machine intelligence sit behind policy, DLP, audit logs, and a secrets manager, connecting secured tools and MCP servers to any large language model, managed from the admin portal.

Both paths · the request path

The request path: six steps for every agent call

The agent is configured with Kindo's endpoints as its model API and MCP server, and a Kindo-issued key. From then on every model request and every data or tool request takes this path. Policy is decided at 3 and 4; a deny returns to the agent and is recorded, and never reaches the provider or the source.

Both paths · the record

What the Audit Trail records for each call

One record per call for any agent; harness runs add the action-level columns.

Field

Gateway call · any agent

Harness action · agents in Kindo

Who

agent · operator · Group · owner

+ approver of any gated step

What

model or source · request type

+ step, tool action, run

Decision

allow / deny · DLP action

+ gate outcome, pause, resume

Cost

tokens in / out · attributed spend

+ per step, per run

Read by

IT, Security, Finance, Compliance, from one Audit Trail. Maps to NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act oversight expectations (mapping, not certification).

Path 2 · the harness runtime

The Kindo agent harness runtime

Agents built or ported into Kindo keep the request path and add execution control.

Harness adds

Step gates, pause and resume, in-run intervention, agent-to-agent inspection, action-level record, SIFT, 24x7 support. Per-run credentials.

Triggers

Operator request in Action Chat; event from a source; schedule.

Steps

Model reasoning and tool actions in sequence; a different model per step if wanted.

Gates

Run holds until a named person approves; approver written to the record.

Intervention

Pause, resume, inspect, adjust, stop, from the AI Operations Center.

Building

Agent Builder, Action Chat, open APIs. A library of pre-built agents ships with the platform.

Isolation

Being confirmed with product; not claimed here.

Path 2 · SIFT, run avoidance

Deep Hat SIFT: run avoidance for noisy event sources

Triage agents run once per event; on busy sources most runs find nothing. SIFT reads the source first, learns from the paired agent's verdicts, and, once a person approves a threshold, stops starting runs for events the agent would dismiss.

Learning

Gold set of ~50 human-checked events; agent verdicts (actionable, benign, insufficient data).

Shadow mode

Score all, send all, until a person approves an operating point with a written reason. Two approvals to activate.

Measurement

Recall and miss rate, never accuracy. 3% leak-through keeps the miss rate measured. No savings claim.

Fail open

Drift or breaching the hourly ceiling returns the filter to shadow. Every withheld event logged.

Footprint

Self-hosted; one Docker Compose host; CPU scoring; one Kindo API key; one tenant; 30-day retention; air-gapped via pinned weights.

Boundaries

Never writes or runs code. Local accounts, trusted perimeter. Not employee monitoring. Docs →

What do IT, Security, Finance, and Compliance get from the record?

IT, Security, Finance, and Compliance get four capabilities from Kindo's record: the Unified AI Registry, Agent FinOps, the AI Operations Center, and policy, DLP, and the Audit Trail.

The Audit Trail maps to NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act oversight expectations (a mapping, not a certification). Sample values in product graphics are illustrative.

What workflows run on Kindo?

Kindo runs operational workflows for IT, Security, Finance, and Compliance teams using Kindo's pre-built agents, or agents you already run, governed through Kindo. Each depends on connected systems and permissions.

Security operations

  • Alert ingestion and correlation

  • Investigation and enrichment

  • Threat prioritization

  • Guided analyst response

  • Case management and handoff

  • SOC-to-IR escalation

Incident response

  • Multi-source incident context

  • Attack timeline analysis

  • Root-cause investigation

  • Severity assessment

  • Response-plan generation

  • Remediation verification and closure

Vulnerability management

  • Scanner ingestion and normalization

  • Risk-based prioritization

  • Vulnerability triage

  • Remediation-ticket automation

  • Ownership and asset context

Network security workflows

  • Network-log ingestion and parsing

  • IP reputation and enrichment

  • Suspicious-traffic review

  • Threat scoring

  • Triage summaries

  • Authorized containment, gated for approval

Governance, risk, and compliance

  • Control monitoring

  • Evidence collection and validation

  • Configuration and control-drift checks

  • Risk assessment

  • Remediation tasks and ownership

  • Audit reporting

Pentest and security testing

  • Authorized reconnaissance and enumeration

  • Adversary-technique simulation

  • Attack-path analysis

  • Privilege-escalation testing, gated for approval

  • Findings and evidence capture

  • Defensive remediation handoff

Threat intelligence

  • Feed ingestion and correlation

  • Campaign and TTP analysis

  • Environment-specific relevance

  • Analyst summaries

  • Actionable outputs

  • Detection and response integration

Identity lifecycle workflows

  • Joiner, mover, leaver

  • Privileged-access review

  • Access-request triage and approved provisioning

  • Dormant and orphaned account review

  • MFA and conditional-access checks

  • Identity reporting and audit records

Why choose Kindo as your enterprise AI control center?

Kindo is the control layer across all agentic work rather than a point solution inside one function: three capabilities together, any agent without a rebuild, one record for four teams. A gateway sees traffic. An operations center controls outcomes.

01

All three capabilities, together, on premises

Data gateway, model gateway, and RBAC in one product. Most alternatives have one, in their cloud.

02

Any agent, no rebuild

Point what you already run at Kindo. Your gateway, builders, and security tools keep their jobs.

03

One record, four teams

IT, Security, Finance, and Compliance read the same history instead of four tool logs.

Deploy anywhere

Where Kindo deploys: cloud, VPC, on premises, air-gapped

Credentials, data, and metadata stay with you. Never depend on one AI lab.

Kindo cloud

Popular models enabled; your provider keys.

Your cloud or VPC

Your account, region, boundary.

On premises

All three capabilities and every MCP server.

Air-gapped

No external calls; local models; SIFT weights pinned.

Identity

Okta, Microsoft Entra, LDAP.

Models

Any provider; open weights locally; existing gateway as provider.

SIFT

Separate service; one Docker Compose host; CPU.

Tenancy

Divisions, regions, JVs as tenants.

Diagram depicting a self-managed infrastructure with servers, multiple databases linked to a Kindo-Secured RAG, several security and compliance agents, connecting to self-managed LLMs and external LLM providers through a Kindo-Secured inference within a self-managed VPC.

Integrations

Integrations: how Kindo works with your existing tools

Kindo reads your stack and acts through it. Nothing is replaced.

Sources

SIEM, EDR, CASB, firewall, expense, endpoint: discovery reads them to build the registry and agents read them for context.

Actions

ServiceNow, Jira, GitHub and others: agents act through them, gated where the action is destructive.

Identity

Okta, Microsoft Entra, LDAP: the source of truth for who may do what.

Named

Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike, ServiceNow, Splunk, Jira, GitHub, Okta, Microsoft, Cofense, and more. Tool catalog →

Deep Hat

Deep Hat, Kindo's cybersecurity model, for authorized security testing

Deep Hat, Kindo's cybersecurity model, runs inside the harness under the same RBAC, gates, and record as every other agent.

What it is

A model built for red teams and security operators: infrastructure, security, and incident-response context.

What it does here

Authorized, human-in-the-loop testing of your own environment: reconnaissance, attack-path analysis, privilege-escalation testing, findings and evidence, defensive handoff.

Why on the platform

Every step is scoped by RBAC, destructive steps wait for approval, and the full action record is the test report's evidence.

Also

The same model option is available to SOC, IR, and vulnerability workflows above. Pentest and Security Testing →

Deep Hat logo beside a Python Scapy code snippet that defines a DDoS test function.

SOC 2 Type II. Supports ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, and NIST CSF. Controls and records support compliance work; they do not establish automatic compliance. Security and compliance →

How do you get started?

Request a Kindo demo to see one request pass identity, policy, and DLP, a gate stop a step in a harness run, and the record both leave behind. Or start with the free shadow AI assessment and build the registry first.

A platform purchase includes everything: three capabilities, harness, Action Chat, SIFT, and the pre-built agent library. The assessment is the only free offer.

Platform FAQ

Frequently asked questions about how Kindo works

What is an AI agent management platform?

An AI agent management platform is software that manages AI agents independent of where they were built or run: one view of what each agent reaches, what it costs, and what controls apply. Kindo is an AI agent management platform, also called an enterprise AI control center, built for the IT, Security, Finance, and Compliance teams that must support and control agents rather than for the developers who build them.

How does Kindo track AI costs by team?

Every model call passes the AI Model Gateway, which meters tokens and attributes them to the agent, its operator, and its Group. Agent FinOps rolls that up by team, model, and step. Budget alerts fire when a Group, model, or agent reaches the threshold you set.

What is recorded for a third-party agent versus an agent in Kindo?

Third-party, through the gateways: a call-level record (agent, operator, Group, owner, model or source, tokens, decision, DLP action, time). In the harness: that for every call, plus each step, tool action, output, gate outcome and approver, pause and resume, and agent-to-agent messages.

How are DLP filters defined, and where do they run?

Attached by an admin to a model-and-Group rule: presets, user-defined lists, or regex. They run in the gateway on the request before forwarding and on the response before return, redacting rather than only blocking. Large documents are chunked so filters see everything.

How are keys issued and revoked?

Provider keys are entered once and vaulted. Kindo issues its own keys to agents and harnesses, tied to an operator and Group. Revocation is one action, effective on the next request. Harness agents get credentials per run; third-party keys persist until revoked.

Where does Kindo fit with the AI gateway we already run?

Keep it. Databricks AI Gateway or Azure AI Foundry becomes a provider inside Kindo, with Kindo's policy, DLP, metering, and record in front. Copilot Studio routes through Kindo as a model family in Foundry, since it exposes no model API of its own. Roughly 80% of workloads are coverable today; the rest as vendors open APIs.

Can an external agent bypass Kindo's controls?

Controls apply to requests routed through Kindo. A direct call to a provider with a provider key is outside that path, which is why provider keys are vaulted and agents hold Kindo keys, and why discovery comes first: the registry shows agents not yet routed.

Can we require approval before a sensitive action?

In the harness, a step-level gate holds the run until a named person approves, and the approver is recorded. Through the gateways, policy can allow or deny any model or data call; it does not orchestrate an external agent's internal steps.

Does SIFT require the harness?

Yes. SIFT decides whether to start a run of a Kindo agent, so the paired agent runs in the harness. SIFT itself is a separate self-hosted service: one Docker Compose host, one Kindo API key, CPU scoring, reading the source through the tenant's existing integration.

Does an air-gapped deployment keep every data flow local?

Flows depend on configured models and destinations. Hosting Kindo locally does not make a call to an external provider local; local open-weight models and on-prem MCP servers do. The gateway record shows the destination of every call, so the path can be verified rather than assumed.

Do you replace our SIEM, SOAR, or network security?

No. Kindo automates work on top of them and reads their data as inputs. It does not detect threats as the product or replace SIEM, XDR, SOAR, or network AI security.